If you would
like to receive our monthly electronic newsletter, please subscribe
by clicking here.
To read articles
from previous versions of Ethics Today, please visit the
Ethics Today archives.
Ethics
Today Online
Published
by the Ethics Resource Center
January 2005 Volume 3, Issue 4

****************************************************************************
****************************************************************************
**
A Word from the President: Looking Back and Looking Forward
In this issue, we revisit the stories
determined by an ERC staff vote to be the top ethics-related stories
of 2004. We note with interest that many of these stories received,
ethically speaking, both positive and negative press at the time.
These events, and the public discussion surrounding them, demonstrate
the increasingly important role of ethics in personal and professional
decision-making.
Indeed, within the past few years,
the field of organizational ethics has come into the spotlight,
and we now see ethics accorded greater significance in organizations
of all types, from small learning environments to governments to
multinational corporations. This heightened awareness of ethics
gives us reason to be hopeful about the future, as more organizations
realize that integrating values and ethics into their environments
will give individuals the tools they need most when faced with situations
where the "right" decision may not be clear-cut - or easy.
We are also optimistic about the ERC's
future and especially about the value we can add to an ever-expanding
field of organizational ethics. As the oldest and first nonprofit
in the United States devoted to organizational ethics, our history
of contributions to the development of ethics-related initiatives
in corporations, governments, nonprofits and schools is unparalleled.
Over the years, through private engagements and public research,
we have collected data that now serves as a valuable resource to
organizations that wish to benchmark against their peers. In addition,
critical insights acquired through core services, such as program
evaluations and organizational risk assessments, can help organizations
identify not only how often employees encounter situations that
potentially violate the law or company standards but whether employees
are prepared to face difficult situations and make ethical decisions
and particular areas for further company training and education.
As ERC emphasizes research-based efforts in the days ahead, our
capability in understanding organizational ethical culture will
serve us well.
The ERC will always remember 2004 as
a year of great challenge, but also a time of critical importance
for us as a center. We weathered transitions in senior leadership,
endured the challenges of scarce resources, and bravely posed difficult
questions to ourselves with regard to our position in the field.
As a result, we move forward into 2005 with great anticipation and
excitement and with a redefined focus on expanding our efforts in
our areas of core competency. Though we take a look back on 2004
in this issue of Ethics Today, we look forward even more to sharing
new research, products and services in this newsletter in the coming
months.
Patricia J. Harned, Ph.D.
President
(Return to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
The Top Ten Ethics Stories of 2004
Please note: The descriptions of
the events below have been compiled from stories reported in major
news publications and their websites. The purpose of this ranking
is not to endorse or condemn the parties, nor to imply special knowledge
of the events or attest to the veracity of the reports, but only
to consolidate what has appeared in the press and to rate the stories
according to their perceived newsworthiness.
1. Abuse at Abu Ghraib Prison
In January 2004, a soldier's report,
and the subsequent investigation, of abuse of Iraqi prisoners by
American soldiers at Abu Ghraib prison preceded public outcry when
pictures were published of detainees photographed naked and in humiliating
positions, alongside their clothed and smiling captors. To date,
reports have found evidence of widespread abuse, dramatic leadership
failure, and fault at the highest levels of the Pentagon. Eight
soldiers have been charged with abusing Iraqi detainees; four have
pleaded guilty and one was found guilty following trial in January
2005.
In his opening statement before the
Senate Armed Services Committee, Army Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba,
who first investigated prisoner abuse by members of the 800th Military
Police Brigade at the Baghdad Central Confinement Facility, focused
on many of the ethics issues involved in this story when he stated:
"As I assembled the investigation
team, my specific instructions to my teammates were clear: maintain
our objectivity and integrity throughout the course of our mission
in what I considered to be a very grave, highly sensitive and
serious situation; to be mindful of our personal values and the
moral values of our nation; and to maintain the Army values in
all of our dealings; and to be complete, thorough and fair in
the course of the investigation.
"Bottom line: We will follow
our conscience and do what is morally right.
"As agonizing as this investigation
was, I commend the exceptional professionalism of my teammates,
their extraordinary efforts and the outstanding manner by which
they carried out my instructions.
"I also commend the courage
and selfless service of those soldiers and sailors who brought
these allegations to light, discovered evidence of abuse, and
turned it over to the military law enforcement authorities.
"The criminal acts of a few
stand in stark contrast to the high professionalism, competence
and moral integrity of countless active, Guard and Army Reserve
soldiers that we encountered in this investigation. "
A special Web section on the Iraq prison,
containing news, background and a copy of the report prepared by
Major General Taguba, had been compiled by MSNBC at:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4855930/
The Washington Post also maintains
a special section on Abu Ghraib at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/world/mideast/gulf/iraq/prisoners/
2. Revisions to Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Since November 1991, the U.S. Sentencing
Commission's Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations (FSG)
have provided the essential foundation from which practitioners
have framed, debated, and researched what it means to have an effective
compliance and ethics program. Designed to encourage "good
corporate citizenship," the organizational guidelines apply
to almost all types of organizations and focus on remedying the
harm caused by the organization by requiring restitution and awarding
an appropriate fine reflecting the seriousness of the offense and
the culpability of the organization or ordering it to serve community
service.
Effective November 1, 2004, the organizational
guidelines now incorporate over a decade of experience, including
statutory and regulatory reforms, to provide a more comprehensive
and demanding framework. The revisions require high level personnel
to be knowledgeable about the compliance and ethics program, to
perform their assigned duties consistent with the exercise of due
diligence, and to promote an organizational culture that encourages
ethical conduct and a commitment to compliance with the law.
More specifically, the Commission's
definition of an effective compliance and ethics program now has
three subsections: subsection (a) the purpose of a compliance and
ethics program, subsection (b) seven minimum requirements of such
a program, and subsection (c) the requirement to periodically assess
the risk of criminal conduct and design, implement, or modify the
seven program elements, as needed, to reduce the risk of criminal
conduct.
We take this to mean that the organization
must:
- Effectively identify the risks and
uncertainties it faces,
- Determine what outcomes it expects
its compliance and ethics program to achieve over the relevant
period,
- Design, implement and enforce a
program meeting the seven minimum requirements to achieve those
outcomes, and
- Periodically conduct an outcomes-based
evaluation of the programs effectiveness.
In a series of articles published in
Ethics Today Online, Kenneth Johnson, writing as an ERC Adjunct
Senior Consultant, describes and comments upon the US Sentencing
Commission's amended requirements for an "effective program
to prevent and detect violations of law."
Read the first article "Key Points
and Profound Changes" at:
/resources/article_detail.cfm?ID=861
Read part 2 in this series "Enterprise
Risk Management" (also referenced above):
/resources/article_detail.cfm?ID=864
Read part 3 in this series "Seven
Minimum Requirements" article at:
/resources/article_detail.cfm?ID=867
Get a copy of the Federal Sentencing
Guidelines Manual and Appendices, which contains the federal sentencing
guidelines and policy statements effective November 1, 2004, at:
http://www.ussc.gov/2004guid/TABCON04.htm
3. 2004 Presidential Election
The 2004 U.S. Presidential campaign
was marked by accusations of lying by and about both sides, concerns
about the propriety of advertising funded by 527 groups, questions
of media integrity, and the infusion of varying interpretations
of "moral values" into the race. Following the election,
allegations of voting irregularities and systemic flaws arose in
a number of jurisdictions.
Several months later, objective analysis
on many of these issues is elusive. The question of voting irregularities,
however, has been analyzed by Electionline.org in an Election Reform
Briefing funded by the Pew Trusts.
"While the result of the 2004
presidential election exceeded the margin of litigation, it fell
far short of the margin of concern. Problems around the country,
including malfunctioning machines, inconsistent procedures for
counting provisional ballots and long lines in some states indicated
election reform is not finished, but rather at a midpoint. This
post-election analysis looks at what went wrong, what went right
and what changes could be likely in the future to address the
old and new concerns raised on November 2."
Read the full report at:
http://www.pewtrusts.org/pdf/Electionline_Brief9_1204.pdf
or
http://www.electionline.org/index.jsp?page=Publications
4. Martha Stewart Trial
Following an investigation that ran
more than two years, Martha Stewart was found guilty in March of
obstruction of justice and related charges stemming from the sale
of her shares of ImClone Systems. Ms. Stewart and her broker Peter
Bacanovic both denied to federal investigators that she had received
nonpublic information and that she had received a tip from Imclone
founder and former chief executive Samuel Waksal. Ms. Stewart was
sentenced to five months in prison, five months in home confinement,
and two years under supervision by the probation office and was
fined $30,000 for obstruction of justice, conspiracy and lying to
federal investigators.
View a CBS interactive feature about
Martha Stewart and Imclone at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/troubled_companies/
imclone/html/framesource_imclone.html
Read more about the Martha Stewart
trial at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/business/specials/marthastewart/
5. Merck Withdraws Vioxx
In September, Merck &. Co., Inc.,
announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal of its pain medication
Vioxx after data from a clinical trial showed an increased relative
risk for cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke,
in patients taking Vioxx for more than 18 months. According to the
company's press release, Vioxx has been marketed in more than 80
countries and worldwide sales in 2003 were $2.5 billion.
"We are taking this action because
we believe it best serves the interests of patients," said
Raymond V. Gilmartin, chairman, president and chief executive
officer of Merck. "Although we believe it would have been
possible to continue to market VIOXX with labeling that would
incorporate these new data, given the availability of alternative
therapies, and the questions raised by the data, we concluded
that a voluntary withdrawal is the responsible course to take."
Read the press release at:
http://www.merck.com/newsroom/press_releases/product/2004_0930.html
6. Fannie Mae's Accounting Problems
In September, government regulators
accused the mortgage finance company, Fannie Mae, of using improper
accounting methods that raise serious questions about the quality
of its management and the validity of its financial reports. A report
from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise alleged that Fannie
Mae had "systematically manipulated accounting estimates, ignored
accounting requirements it had lobbied unsuccessfully against and
operated with weak internal controls that helped obscure the other
problems." In a letter to the company, regulators said the
organization "maintained a corporate culture that emphasized
stable earnings at the expense of accurate financial disclosures."
Chairman and chief executive Franklin
D. Raines stepped down in December, as did chief financial officer
J. Timothy Howard, shortly after the SEC directed the company to
make accounting corrections that could erase $9 billion of past
profit. The company also dismissed KPMG LLP, the outside accounting
firm that audited the financial statements.
The company faces a criminal investigation
by the Justice Department; a civil investigation by the SEC; an
ongoing probe of other accounting issues by its main regulator,
the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight; and class-action
lawsuits by investors.
In a statement, Raines said: "I
previously stated that I would hold myself accountable if the SEC
determined that significant mistakes were made in the Company's
accounting. Although, to my knowledge, the Company has always made
good faith efforts to get its accounting right, the SEC has determined
that mistakes were made. By my early retirement, I have held myself
accountable."
Read more about the Fannie Mae situation
at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/business/specials/fanniemae/
7. NIH Blue Ribbon Panel on Conflicts of Interest
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Director Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., established a Blue Ribbon Panel
on Conflict of Interest Policies to examine the guidelines governing
consulting activities of NIH scientists. The Panel was charged with
reviewing the existing conflicts of interest and financial disclosure
laws, regulations, policies, and procedures under which NIH currently
operates and making recommendations for improving them. According
to the final report, the Panel found an "extremely complex"
set of rules governing conflicts of interest at NIH, which are "widely
misunderstood by some of the very people to whom they are intended
to apply, thereby creating uncertainty as to allowable behavior
and adversely affecting morale." In developing its recommendations,
the Panel said, it "adhered to one guiding principle: NIH employees
must avoid conflicts of interest incompatible with the proper exercise
of their authority and the proper performance of their duties."
ERC Fellows founding chairman and former
CEO of Lockheed Martin Norm Augustine served as co-chairman and
ERC Chairman of the Board Stephen D. Potts was a member of the Panel.
Read the final report including the
Panel's 18 recommendations at:
http://www.nih.gov/about/ethics_COI_panelreport.pdf
Co-Chairman Augustine discusses how
the Panel resolved difficult issues involving colliding principles
as they reviewed the NIH conflicts of interest policies at:
/resources/article_detail.cfm?ID=204
8. Paul Hamm's Gold Medal
In August, Paul Hamm recovered from
a fall on the vault to become the first American male to win an
Olympic gold medal in the all around gymnastics competition. Two
days later, the International Gymnastics Federation announced that
South Korea's Yang Tae-young, who finished third, had been wrongly
docked a tenth of a point on his second-to-last routine, a difference
which would have put him 0.051 points ahead of Mr. Hamm, assuming
everything else remained the same. The South Koreans approached
both the U.S. Olympic Committee and the IOC to no avail in hopes
of adjusting the rankings. On the final day of the games, Yang filed
an appeal with the Court for Arbitration for Sport on the final
day of the games. In November, a three-judge panel from the Court
of Arbitration for Sport dismissed the appeal.
In "Paul Hamm's Once in a Lifetime
Opportunity," ERC Board Chairman Steve Potts, former member
of the US Olympic Committee, wrote that Paul Hamm had the chance
to create a legacy of inspiring sportsmanship for all time by giving
up the gold medal. "Paul Hamm is a deserving winner,"
said Mr. Potts. "But, through no fault of his own, there is
tarnish on his medal." Mr. Potts goes on to say that the rules
of a game exist to assure a level playing field for the competitors.
"Making a wise decision under these circumstances requires
recognition of the fact that rules are not our masters. Our sense
of justice demands that we know when to make an exception to the
rule," he said.
Read the rest of Mr. Potts article
at:
/resources/article_detail.cfm?ID=860
Read the decision of the Court of Arbitration
for Sport at:
http://www.tas-cas.org/en/pdf/yang.pdf
9. SEC Advisor's Code of Conduct
In May, the Securities and Exchange
Commission voted to adopt form amendments regarding disclosure requirements
for mutual funds and a new rule, as well as amendments to rules
and forms, dealing with investment adviser codes of ethics. The
amendments require a mutual fund to provide enhanced disclosure
regarding breakpoint discounts on front-end sales loads and are
intended to assist investors in understanding the breakpoint opportunities
available to them.
The new rule under the Investment Advisers
Act would require registered investment advisers to adopt and enforce
codes of ethics, with certain minimum provisions, that would be
applicable to their supervised persons.
Read the SEC press release at:
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-71.htm
The ERC and the Washington, D.C. office
of Thelen Reid & Priest LLP submitted a joint comment letter
to the SEC regarding the Commission's efforts concerning advisers'
codes of ethics. The ERC and Thelen Reid offered four comments with
respect to the code of ethics requirements under consideration.
Read the comment letter at:
/resources/advisercodecomments.pdf
10. Marsh & McLennan and the Insurance Industry
In October, New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer filed civil charges against Marsh & McLennan,
the world's biggest insurance broker, and announced settlements
of criminal charges with two employees at AIG, the world's biggest
insurer, and one at ACE, a big property-casualty insurer. The suit
accused Marsh of taking payoffs from insurance companies to steer
corporate clients their way rather than acting in the best interest
of the clients and cited other misbehavior including outright threats
against those resisting participation in the fraudulent schemes.
Officials in other states have also been investigating allegations
of price-rigging and kickbacks by insurers and insurance brokers.
At the heart of the matter are "contingent
commissions" - money paid only if the broker places a certain
amount of business with a particular insurer. In May, Advisen, an
insurance industry research company, found that 69% of the 330 risk
managers it canvassed in an anonymous survey considered contingent
commission arrangements a conflict of interest.
For more information about the claims
against the insurance industry, read "The Insurance Scandal:
Just How Rotten?" at:
http://www.cfo.com/printable/article.cfm/3324341?f=options
or
http://www.economist.com/finance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3308447
(Return
to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
** Top Stories from
the ERC in 2004
The year provided more than the usual
number of key events and stories from the Ethics Resource Center.
These included:
1. Dr. Patricia Harned Becomes ERC
President
At its November meeting the Ethics
Resource Center's Board of Directors appointed Patricia J. Harned,
Ph.D., to the position of ERC President and underscored the crucial
central research mission of the organization. Dr. Harned joined
the ERC in 1999 and was appointed Vice President of the ERC in 2003.
She succeeds Dr. Stuart Gilman, who retired as the ERC's President
earlier this year. In accepting the position, she stated, "I
am delighted to be leading the ERC at this time and fully share
the Board's priority to enhance the ERC's national leadership in
advising corporations and advancing research in corporate ethics."
Read the Press Release at:
/releases/nr_20041203_patharned.html
2. ERC Ethics Index (SM) Launched
For over a decade, the ERC has been
benchmarking trends in business ethics with the National Business
Ethics Surveys (SM) (NBES), which identifies the impact of ethics
program elements from the point of view of the workforce, the extent
to which employees perceive the informal culture of the organization
as ethical, and the level of misconduct present within an organization.
In August, the ERC introduced the ERC Ethics Index(SM), a benchmarking
solution that leverages a ten-year-old dataset to help organizations
comply with the law while improving their efforts to encourage ethical
business practices. Through the ERC Ethics Index, an organization
can:
- Collect information from their employees
to gauge the effectiveness of their ethics/compliance efforts;
- Benchmark to peer organizations;
and
- Benchmark to national trends.
In the Fall of 2004, the Defense Industry
Initiative on Business Ethics and Conduct (DII) engaged the ERC
to conduct surveys of participating member organizations and to
create an industry-wide standard against which they can benchmark
their individual programs
Read more about the ERC Ethics Index
at:
http://www.ercethicsindex.org
3. Student Fellows Program and Student Ethics Office
Twenty-three high school students participating
in the Student Ethics Office (SM) pilot program gathered
in July 2004 for the first meeting of the Student Fellows Program,
where they discussed leadership styles, the role of ethics offices
and officers, and strategic planning. The five day session overlapped
with the ERC Fellows meeting, allowing student ethics officers to
meet with leading thinkers in the field of organizational ethics
and giving the ERC Fellows a fresh look at the value of school-to-work
programs. In addition, the SEO pilot program that started regionally
in Maryland and Virginia in 2003 expanded to a national pilot with
the addition of a New York City school to the program. Based on
best practices and common sense, SEO's are modeled on corporate
ethics offices and give students the opportunity to build and practice
ethical leadership skills while helping their fellow students.
Learn more about the Student Fellows
Program at:
/character/seo.html
Learn more about the Student Ethics
Office (SM) Model at:
/resources/article_detail.cfm?ID=841
4. Stephen D. Potts becomes Chairman of the ERC Board
Former Director of the United States
Office of Government Ethics Stephen D. Potts became Chairman of
the ERC Board of Directors in July. He had served as Chairman of
the ERC Fellows Program since 2000 and has served on the board of
a number of companies and non-profits, including the US Olympic
Committee and the US Tennis Association and is a past president
of the Washington Tennis and Education Foundation. Mr. Potts praised
his predecessor Ken Frazier, General Counsel and Senior Vice President
at Merck & Co., Inc., noting that "Ken not only brought
to us his commitment to an ethical workplace, he worked to spread
that way of operating throughout corporate America."
5. Ethics and Anti-Corruption Meetings / Global Integrity Alliance
In partnership with the Turkish Ethical
Values Foundation (TEDMER) and the World Bank, the ERC hosted two
ethics and anti-corruption meetings in Istanbul, Turkey, in March
2004. The first day focused on strategies for cross-sector collaboration
to promote a national integrity agenda in Turkey. The following
two days brought together ethics and anti-corruption practitioners
from more than 20 countries, representing ethics and anticorruption
NGOs, multinational corporations, intergovernmental institutions
and multilateral organizations in a "Forum for a Global Integrity
Alliance". Following the March meetings in Turkey, the ERC,
with financial support from the World Bank, launched a membership
website to support the Global Integrity Alliance (GIA), which seeks
to coordinate and further develop ethics and good governance efforts
around the world through capacity building, research, dialogue,
cross-sectoral partnerships and anti-corruption initiatives.
Read more about the conferences at:
/I_turkeyconferences.html
Learn about the Global Integrity Alliance
at:
/gia/index.html
6. ERC Co-Sponsors Forum on Cheating and America's Crisis of
Integrity
In cooperation with Demos, a nonprofit,
nonpartisan research and advocacy organization, the ERC sponsored
a public forum examining the depth of America's crisis of integrity.
Speakers included Norman Augustine, Retired CEO and Chairman of
Lockheed Martin Corporation; Dr. Belle Wheelan, Secretary of Education
for the State of Virginia; Frank Shorter, Olympic Gold Medalist
and Founding Chair, U.S. Anti-Doping Agency; David Callahan, Director
of Research at Demos and Author of "The Cheating Culture";
and Stuart Gilman, former President, Ethics Resource Center. Knight
Kiplinger, Editor in Chief of The Kiplinger Letter, moderated the
forum, which was hosted at the DC headquarters of Kiplinger Washington
Editors, Inc.
Read more about the forum at:
/events.html
Read the press release at:
/releases/nr_20040227_integrity.html
7. Leaders on Ethics Program Debuts
Based on the insight that one of the
most effective teaching tools is the use of narrative, the ERC and
PLI-Corpedia videotaped interviews with more than 20 CEO's and other
senior business leaders talking about their personal perspectives
on ethics in the workplace and the experiences that shaped their
character. Excerpts from the interviews are available for public
viewing on the Leaders On Ethics website. Future plans include creating
related case studies to be provided along with the video to business
schools, law schools and corporate managers in an effort to encourage
future leaders to consider the role of character in the workplace
and to learn from the decisions made by some of today's top corporate
leaders.
Read more about this project and view
several interviews at:
http://www.leadersonethics.org
8. Ethics Today Adds Games Feature
A Values Word Search puzzle published
in the June issue of Ethics Today brought dozens of reprint requests
and initiated a new periodic feature for the ERC's electronic newsletter.
The Word Search was followed by a Presidential Quotes Matching Quiz
in October and an Ethics and Values Crossword Puzzle that premieres
in this issue.
Try out the ethics games and puzzles
at:
/games/index.html
Contact Allison@ethics.org
for information about reprinting these puzzles or other articles
featured in Ethics Today.
(Return
to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
** More Resources
Regarding the Top Stories of 2004
A few publications produced ethics
related reviews of the year 2004. These included:
Quite a few publications ranked the
top ten general news stories of 2004, including:
(Return
to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
Enrollment in OCEG Voluntary Benchmarking Study Deadline January
31
The Open Compliance and Ethics Group
(OCEG) is currently enrolling interested organizations in a voluntary
benchmarking study of governance, risk management, compliance, and
ethics programs. The study involves a self-administered survey,
and will yield a report of comparisons with regard to program practices
and internal resources. Participation in the study is confidential
and free, and as of the end of December, over 350 organizations
were enrolled. Deadline for enrollment has been extended for
friends of the ERC to Monday, January 31, 2005.
Learn more about and participate in
the benchmarking study at:
http://www.oceg.org/benchmarking.asp
Learn more about OCEG at:
http://www.oceg.org
Please note: The OCEG benchmarking
study examines best practices. For information about the ERC's benchmarking
studies examining ethics and compliance program impact measures,
please visit:
http://www.ercethicsindex.org
(Return
to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
Ethics and Values Crossword
As part of a continuing series of ethics
and values puzzles and games, the ERC has developed a crossword
puzzle using terms from our ethics glossary and definitions of values.
The puzzle can be completed online if web scripting is enabled on
your browser, or the puzzle and clues can be printed and completed
on paper.
Complete the Ethics and Values Crossword
puzzle at:
/games/crossword.html
See our other ethics related puzzles
at:
/games/index.html
Individuals and organizations who wish to reprint this puzzle for
non-commercial use in their internal publications, newsletters,
or classroom materials should complete the online "permission
to use" form or contact allison@ethics.org.
Commercial use of this puzzle is prohibited without specific written
permission from the ERC.
Request permission to reprint this
puzzle for non-commercial use at:
/games/permissionpuzzles.html
(Return
to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
Everyday Ethics: Civility in Congress
While not an intimate part of most
people's daily routine, bickering and vitriol seemed to be omnipresent
in the daily news during the 2004 election campaign, especially
within the U.S. Congress.
U.S. Representative Steve Israel, a
Democrat from New York's 2nd congressional district and U.S. Representative
Timothy V. Johnson, a Republican from Illinois' 15th congressional
district recently called for colleagues on both sides of the aisle
to think about serving the American people with a higher level of
civility.
The two Congressmen co-authored an
editorial for USA Today that focused on the contentiousness of the
campaign and the 108th Congress. In it, they announced that they
are organizing a Congressional Civility Caucus with the goal of
creating a bipartisan group of House members that will strive for
civil debate in Washington.
"We hope this caucus will change
the current dynamics in the House by injecting a voice that rises
above partisanship when politics becomes more about personal attacks
than about serving our constituents," they said. "Our
differences do matter. But philosophical differences need not become
personal destruction."
While Congress is more publicly confrontational
than most organizations, the proposal by these Congressmen sets
forth an objective worthy of consideration by any organization.
Read the editorial at:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/
2005-01-09-congress-edit_x.htm
(Return to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
Best of Ethics Today Volume 2
The ERC announces the publication of
a 16-page electronic collection of 12 articles that were among those
most viewed by ET subscribers from September 2003 through July 2004.
Articles reprinted from the second volume of Ethics Today Online
include:
- Business Ethics in the 21st Century
- Students Building Character
- Ethics and Compliance: One World
or Two?
- Globalizing a Code of Ethics
- Why Small Organizations Need Our
Help
- How Do You Deal with a Situation
When Your Personal Values Clash with the Legitimate Business of
an Organization?
- What to Do After Your Code of Conduct
is Written
- The Role of Leadership in Organizational
Integrity and Five Modes of Ethical Leadership
- Conflicts of Interest
- Ethics Effectiveness Quick Test
Excerpt: Leadership
- Can You Distinguish a "Gift"
from a "Bribe"? And Who Is Responsible for Drawing This
Line?
- Are Unethical Decisions More a Function
of the Individual Decision Maker or the Decision Maker's Environment?
- Values Word Search Puzzle
Get a free PDF copy of Selections from
Ethics Today, Volume 2, at:
/pdfs/BestofETVol2.pdf
The Best of Ethics Today, Volume 1,
is available at:
/pdfs/bestofetv1.pdf
(Return
to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
Publications and Media Coverage
"The Ethics Challenge in Public
Service: A Problem-Solving Guide," by Carol L. Lewis and former
ERC President Stuart C. Gilman, will be published by Jossey-Bass
in March 2005.
Since it was first published in 1991,
The Ethics Challenge in Public Service has become a classic text
used by public managers and in public management programs across
the country. This second edition is filled with practical tools
and techniques for making ethical choices in the ambiguous, pressured
world of public service. It explores the day-to-day ethical dilemmas
managers face in their work, including what to do when rules recommend
one action and compassion another, and whether it is ethical to
dissent from agency policy. This essential text explores managers'
accountability to different stakeholders and how to balance the
often competing responsibilities.
Read comments about "The Ethics
Challenge in Public Service" at:
/resources/book_detail.cfm?ID=868
Order this book at:
http://www.josseybass.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0787967564.html
(Return to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
News from the ERC
As part of a joint project with the
Prince of Wales International Business Leaders' Forum (IBLF), ERC
Consultant Cheryl Raven and Associate Consultant Abby Davidson visited
the Turkish Ethical Values Foundation (TEDMER) for a week in January.
The objective of the project is to help affiliated ethics centers
in Colombia, South Africa and Turkey review their efforts to promote
ethical business practices and good governance and to examine strategies
for building local business ethics capacity.
(Return to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
Support Organizational Ethics Research (and get NBES 2005)
The National Business Ethics Survey
(NBES)SM has proven to be of great value to organizations, as it
identifies the issues and challenges facing our nation's employees
that must be addressed in order to create and sustain an effective
ethics program. The 2005 version of the study will undertake additional
analysis of compliance practices, communications efforts by corporations,
and industry-specific measures. We are in need of sponsors to enable
us to expand the survey to allow for increased representation of
prominent industries. Sponsors of this effort will help create a
widely used and highly respected resource that business leaders,
educators, and researchers like yourself can use to advance ethics
and integrity in your workplace, schools and society.
Donors of a tax-deductible contribution
of $50 or more will receive a complimentary copy of our 2005 NBES
and acknowledgment as a sponsor in the publication.
Make a contribution to the 2005 NBES
at:
/2005nbesdonation.html
For more information or to make a major
contribution, contact Development Manager Allison Pendell-Jones
at allison@ethics.org.
(Return to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**
Offering Our Thanks
As a non-profit organization, the Ethics
Resource Center depends on contributions from many generous donors.
Without their dedication and trust, many of the programs and projects
highlighted in this newsletter would not be possible.
The ERC thanks the following for their
contributions of general support:
- Mr. and Mrs. Owen Ambur
- Jim Hamilton
- Ted Hester
- Brent Scowcroft
- Colleen Sayther Cunningham
- Robert Swayne
The ERC also thanks the following for
contributions in support of specific programs:
- The Avni Foundation, in support
of the Character Education programs
We acknowledge with appreciation contributions
to the NBES Customer Campaign from the following:
We invite you to join our loyal contributors
in lending your support.
You can make a tax-deductible credit
card donation online at:
/miva/merchant.mv?Screen
=CTGY&Store_Code=ERC&Category_Code=D
To find out about other ways to contribute,
go to:
/support_how.html
The Ethics Resource Center (ERC) is
a non-profit, non-partisan educational organization exempt from
taxation under the Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
All gifts are tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.
(Return to top of newsletter)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PLEASE NOTE: Ethics Today will be published
10 times this year. The November and December issues will be combined
into one issue, as will the July and August issues.
=======================================================
Copyright (c) 2004 Ethics Resource
Center. All rights reserved.
Please contact ethics@ethics.org
for information about reproducing any of the information contained
within this newsletter or on our web site.
Back issues of Ethics Today are available
online at:
/today/et_archives.html
For questions about your subscription,
please email
ethicstodayonline@ethics.org
The Ethics Resource Center, 1747 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: 202-737-2258
=======================================================